I
have read lots of (well – “a few” might be more accurate) Henry James novels,
and, oddly, when I think of them, the picture which immediately comes to mind
is of ladies going to evening
lectures. They seemingly were
always doing it and it appeared to be their main source of outside leisure
activity. I found this sort of
intriguing, and thought it a poor thing as a major amusement resource. At the same time, across the wide waters, folks were flocking
to readings of Dickens novels, most notably, readings given by Mr. Dickens
himself. And I do mean flocking.
Apparently, they were blockbuster events - much like going to a Rolling
Stones concert, I would imagine.
I
have been to lots of lectures in school, and while they were occasionally
stultifying, but more often, interesting – sometimes even inspiring – I would
not really characterize even the best of them as entertaining. Now, I know better. I have been very Victorian recenty, and have been enjoying
just these sorts of things.
Last evening, I went to an annual Cathedral event – a reading of
Dickens’ Christmas Carol by Scott Webster. While I fully expected to enjoy it, I was astonished at what
an marvelous experience it was. Scott made Scrooge and Bob Cratchit come alive. One was immersed in that snowy London
Christmas, shivering with poor Mr. Cratchit in his corner of the counting house, and
trembling with Scrooge as he later received his comeuppance from the three ghosts.
The audience was completely
rapt. It was quite as exciting –
nay, in truth, more exciting than a movie would have been.
I
don’t know why I should have been surprised, as I have always felt that Dickens
is best read aloud, and adore listening to recordings. However, I have only had a few
opportunities to listen to a really good Dickens reader in person. Once, years ago, Father Fulton dined with us, and after dinner, read a chapter or two of Pickwick
Papers. Another time, a friend
read us about Aunt Betsy Trotwood and her troubles with the donkeys. Both of
these readings were over twenty years ago, but they made such a vivid
impression that they seem quite recent.
And last night, Scott topped them by a mile.
As for the ladies and their lecture going – I quite understand
it fully now. Corinna’s lectures
on 19th Century spiritual poets were sooooooo fun! I am sadly unpoetic, and need
encouragement to delve into the depths any poem longer than a haiku, but
Corinna made these giants wax vibrant and fascinating. I am sorry there were only four
lectures, and am looking forward to next year when (maybe) we will study the
metaphysical poets. I am quite
looking forward to “The Flea.”
5 comments:
Scott definitely outdid himself this year!
I think we will have to substitute "At the round earth's imagined corners" and "Death, be not proud" for "The Flea." Hard to believe a Dean could write such poems!
Interesting post. You are so well read and intelligent.
Way out of my league.
That is sooooo not true, Martha! You are the best ever!
Great post Joanna.
I have discovered an audio book app for my iphone and am rediscovering the delights of being read to. A Tale of Two Cities is next on my list.
Post a Comment