I have had a bad cold all week, but it is the sort of sickness
that one can enjoy – for a few days at least. Then, however, tedium sets in, and one
thinks that maybe this illness is not so fun after all. The first few days, when I was
scheduled to work, were the most pleasant. There is something wonderful about knowing that you are not
at work, and that you are sufficiently ailing to have no guilt about this, but
that you are insufficiently ill to be only able to lie there and moan. These two days, and the one that
followed were remarkably productive.
I had a shawl that I had been knitting on sporadically for an entire
year. Actually, it was mindless
knitting, from leftover yarn, and I had taken it with me when Becca and I went
out for tea or coffee, or to the opera, where we often knitted in the
intervals. I planned to knit on it
until I ran out of yarn. I thought it would never be done, but suddenly, the
yarn ball was very small. So
I finished it up. I usually have a
novel going, which I read on-line at work whenever I get a break or complete my
tasks and charting early. As being
done on time is a rare circumstance for me, I don’t make much progress on my
on-line book. Consequently, I
have been reading my current choice, The Wouldbegoods, for a very long
time. In fact, I was shocked to
see on my Goodreads account that I started it a year ago! It is my least
favorite
E. Nesbit novel, and so I was not that compelled to devote myself to
it. So slightly boring, and also
slightly long – not a compelling combination. (I love
Five Children and It, and The Railroad Children.) The
last time I worked, I read a few pages, and saw that I was very close to the
end. I am getting tired of the
Wouldbegoods, and am eager to start something else, so I finished that. I felt as though I was cheating a
little, reading it at home, but it was only a page or two. I have also been reading
The Way of All Flesh for a long time (but not a year!) and my sick days gave me time to finish
that. This one is one of the
favorites of my youth, and I had been enjoying it very much. The problem was - it is my own
book, and books which I had ordered from the library just kept coming, taking
me by surprise, and demanding that I read them first, lest they become overdue. Also, The Way of All Flesh, I have to confess, while
delightful, gets off to a rather slow start. The hero is not even born until nearly page 100. So, over several months, I had read
through his ancestry, birth, and baptism.
Finally, on my sick days, I read the latter three quarters of the book
at nearly one go. This is a most
delightful book for those not demanding lots of action. It is the sort of thing
that just makes one smile. Most of the action is cerebral, and a little
shocking, given when the book was written. As I read it, I was surprised that
there was not more of a stir about it in its day (1870’s,) as it was an amusing
and somewhat vicious diatribe about Victorian hypocrisy and
narrow-mindedness. I later read
that there was no fuss because Samuel Butler didn’t dare publish it during his
lifetime. It wasn’t published
until after his death in 1903.
Here is a little sample.
The hero, Ernest, is a very earnest young Cambridge student, preparing
for his ordination as a deacon.
With some friends, he attends a lecture by Mr. Hawke, a dissenting
preacher, and, filled with evangelical fervor, he decides to give up all for
Christ, including tobacco. Butler
writes:
He had …. locked up his pipes and
tobacco, so that he might not be tempted to use them. All day long on the day
after Mr. Hawke's sermon he let them lie in his portmanteau bravely; but this
was not very difficult, as he had for some time given up smoking till after
hall. After hall this day he did not smoke till chapel time, and then went to
chapel in self-defence. When he returned he determined to look at the matter
from a common sense point of view. On this he saw that, provided tobacco did
not injure his health--and he really could not see that it did--it stood much
on the same footing as tea or coffee.
Tobacco had nowhere been forbidden
in the Bible, but then it had not yet been discovered, and had probably only
escaped proscription for this reason. We can conceive of St Paul or even our
Lord Himself as drinking a cup of tea, but we cannot imagine either of them as
smoking a cigarette or a churchwarden. Ernest could not deny this, and admitted
that Paul would almost certainly have condemned tobacco in good round terms if
he had known of its existence. Was it not then taking rather a mean advantage
of the Apostle to stand on his not having actually forbidden it? On the other
hand, it was possible that God knew Paul would have forbidden smoking, and had
purposely arranged the discovery of tobacco for a period at which Paul should
be no longer living. This might seem rather hard on Paul, considering all he
had done for Christianity, but it would be made up to him in other ways.
These
reflections satisfied Ernest that on the whole he had better smoke, so he
sneaked to his portmanteau and brought out his pipes and tobacco again.
|
Ernest and his tobacco |
As you can see, the illustrations in my edition are pretty hideous - but better than no illustrations at all.